MemberPost
Part 1: Trial of JFR et al by Amazing on
Re: Part 1: Trial of JFR et al by Gopher on
Re: Part 1: Trial of JFR et al by Fredhall on
Re: Part 1: Trial of JFR et al by coffee_black on
Re: Part 1: Trial of JFR et al by Fredhall on
Re: Part 1: Trial of JFR et al by coffee_black on
Re: Part 1: Trial of JFR et al by Pureheart on
Re: Part 1: Trial of JFR et al by VM44 on
Re: Part 1: Trial of JFR et al by Amazing on
Re: Part 1: Trial of JFR et al by VM44 on

MoxyRe: Part 1: Trial of JFR et al
thx amazing - this is very interesting.

although hardly a 'railroad job,' the trial may be fairly characterized as being unjust. this is what i would like to determine from the transcripts. from the timeline, it seems like the trial WAS quick, 45 days from charges to sentencing. i know it was different then than today's back-logged standards, but still, can anyone comment on the comparative speed of that trial.

and anyways they WERE exonerated shortly afterward, so i would have to think something wasnt done right here.

looking forward to more.

mox
IP: CDcwkDn9C9FQERwh