Furuli is most definitely a Jehovah's Witness. He is a former district overseer and has served for a number of years as an HLC member.As Alan has observed, he is not terribly honest in his treatment of evidence antithetical to his JW beliefs. In other words, he's biased. I've also noticed that like many otherwise intelligent JW's, he is prone to invent whatever argument is expedient at the moment while ignoring the question of whether it is contradicted by other aspects of JW theology.
Tom
Tom