MemberPost
WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by Lee Elder on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by hawkaw on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by anewperson on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by Max Divergent on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by Sam Beli on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by Lee Elder on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by Cygnus on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by nicolaou on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by anewperson on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by Lee Elder on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by anewperson on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by SEAKEN2001 on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by anewperson on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by Sam Beli on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by sf on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by waiting on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by waiting on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by MadApostate on

waitingRe: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts


MadAp,

No way would any city council go against an established church like that. Bad politics. It would be a political statement, whether viewed as pro or con. It is legal what the WTBTS is doing and so far, protected by the First Amendment. I truly feel that no politician would take sides, and no city council would allow such a political statement to be put on a boulder - supposedly for a damned long time lasting - in a city park where kids & families play.

Just what every city park (where kids, families & lovers go) wants - a rock with dead people's names on it. Btw, would all other anti-religious statements be allowed on other park boulders? What about political statements? Abortionists? Right to Lifers putting dead babies stats up for all to see?

Just wouldn't happen, imho.

waiting
IP: NRut7gmwhMRDzziZ

Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by waiting on
Re: WT Advance Directive - Just the Facts by anewperson on