MemberPostViewed: times
larcSocial Influence Part I, II


Hello brothers and sisters

Lately, there has been a lot of discussion, re: who is to blame, the organization, the elders, the individual, or all of the above.

I believe that all of the above were trapped in a bad system. I would like to present some findings from Social Psychology to illustrate the influences that make is very difficult for the individual to express free will, as we understand it. The research will be presented from the most ambiguous of situations to the most structured.

Sherif

He used a perceptual phenomena to show how vulnerable we are to the influence of others, the autokinetic effect. This phenomena occurs when a person is placed in a totally dark room and a tiny dot of light is shown on a wall. After awhile the tiny light appears to the person to be moving around. It moves in a random fashion and moves differently for different people. Now, if you have two people sit in a room and report out loud, how much movement there is, an amazing thing happens. Their answers become similiar. Feedback from a random event causes people to start to agree with each other. Agreement on a random event. Isn't that something?

Implications: Take something as ambiguous as the Bible, especially the prophecy books and you find people agreeing on the most ambiguous of information there is. So now, we have different groups who agree on this fuzzy stuff and they argue with others who have a different belief of this fuzzy stuff. It is like arguing over what is the right perception of a Rorschach Inkblot. Guess what. There is no correct answer. Your answer tells more about you than it does about the blot. That is why it is a useful test.

Next time, Soloman Asch and what the length of lines tells us about conformity, followed by Zimbardo, and prison riot on a college campus.
IP: E3A9yNDRBp6Q+//m
hungerartistRe: Social Influence Part I
Well put Larc,

I suppose you have been doing much reading about 'suggestibility'.

I read about a study in which the reseachers 'suggested' by clever questions that a person who just visited Disneyland had met WARNER BROTHERS characters. (Now have you ever seen Batman at Disneyland?)

They even got people to elaborate by saying they took photos with these characters! All off which never happened at all!

The human memory is not perfect.

See the movie Memento, everyone. You'll get a trip from that one.

I hunger for knowledge...

"Every revolution evaporates and leaves only the slime of a new bureaucracy" ~ Franz Kafka
IP: KgN3zs/UfhDrfU88
larcRe: Social Influence Part I
hungerartist,

Suggestibility is another interesting phenomena. If a voodoo witch doctor puts a curse on someone, that person will die of fright, but only if they have found out that they have been cursed. If they don't hear about it, they do just fine. The power of the mind and what it can come to believe is incredable.
IP: E3A9yNDRBp6Q+//m
JeffTRe: Social Influence Part I
Interesting point.

The reason the navigation lights on planes flash is to bypass the perceptual problem you describe. When the light flashes the brain registers exactly where it is. If it was steady the brain would be seeing it in other places.

For the record, ever since I got out of the borg, I've thought that some parts of the Bible are there to make us think about he questions, not to provide the answers.
IP: appd996Iz0c8Kb6+
larcRe: Social Influence Part I
JeffT,

That is interesting. It is another example of how the brain, though a powerful computer, can be become confused and disoriented. Thank you for the information.
IP: E3A9yNDRBp6Q+//m
larcRe: Social Influence Part I, II
Part II

In my first post, I pointed out that in ambiguous situations, people will use feedback from each other to come to common agreement. This occurs even when agreement is not justified.

Now, let us consider how people make decisions in the face of disagreement. Solomon Asch asked persons to make simple, easy judgements regarding the length of lines. In this experiment, four of the persons were told to make wrong judgements on some of the trials. Now, what would the fifth person do when four others disagreed with his own obvious perceptions. In about 2/3rd's of the cases, the person went along with the group rather than disagreeing.

Implications: Four elders agree and one sees obvious problems with their decision. What is the fifth elder likely to do? Conform to the group.

Now let us look at the role someone is given and how it affects their behavior. Phillip Zimbardo conducted a study where he asked one group of college students to play the role of prisoner in an actual jail and the other group to play the role of jailors. This study was to be conducted for a full week. After just three days, Zimbardo had to stop the experiment because the jailors were taking their role too seriously. They became oppressive and harsh and the rules of the game made this possible.
The prisoners became outraged and Zimbardo nearly had a riot on his hands.

One very important fact should be kept in mind. The students were assigned their roled randomly, so the oppressive behaviour of the prison guards and the lashing out by the prisoners can not be accounted for by personality differences between the two groups. The behavioral differences are soley the result of the roles each group played.

Implications: The role you are in greatly affects you.

I have heard of factory workers who were promoted to the level of supervisor. Despite the fact that they were workers themselves at one time, some of them become very oppressive in their new role. The role of elder is not immune from this. Some nice publishers become oppressive elders. If the system, whether it is a factory or a religion does not anticipate this, have and build something into the system to deal with it they will have major problems on their hands.

Next time: some shocking results on the subject of obedience to authority.
IP: E3A9yNDRBp6Q+//m
bigboiRe: Social Influence Part I, II
Next time: some shocking results on the subject of obedience to authority.
That would be interesting. Especiallyif you're planning on basing your next addition on Dr. Stanley Milgram's experiment.

ONE....

bigboi
IP: zJCIQ2hfv0CylebR
OUTLAWRe: Social Influence Part I, II
Hey larc,the Phillip Zimbardo experiment.I saw that on tape,on one of the educational channels.Things got pretty bizarre...OUTLAW
IP: yjNahZ/pXRTPvqkj
larcRe: Social Influence Part I, II
Bingo, bigboi, that's the one. If anyone sees a video of this one, they will find it chilling.

Outlaw, I used to show my students lots of videos. The have much more impact that reading about it, as you can attest.

A side note: Zimbardo had a female graduate who stood up to his authority and convinced him to stop the experiment. This very unusual behavior for a grad. student, since their profs have enormous power over them. Zimbardo was so impressed with this young female, that he married her.
IP: E3A9yNDRBp6Q+//m
refiners fireRe: Social Influence Part I, II
Bring on Zimbardo.
I wanna see that one....oh! Its already there!....okay..

I suppose you already read Sargents "Battle for the mind".
Pretty old, know any updated stuff available?Im pretty interested.
Maos thought reform schools worked on the principle demonstrated with the spot of light, I guess,shift their opinions based on the opinions of others,feedback.
Ive suspected this is the reason (one of them) these churches like to outnumber the recruit while studying with them. Two opinions to one,causes shift to agreement.
The Mormons like to outnumber recuits 5, 6 to 1. An even better chance of compliance and shift.
The mormons like to sow confussion in the minds of new recruits, you expect so and so to be at your study, and its actually some other guy youve never met,they lie about it, they also jerk you around with location, they tell you to go to a certain address, you go there, then theres a phone call, now you have to go somewhere else.
They run you around like musical chairs.
They also seek to induce emotional response in you, the guys studying with you start crying, next, you feel like crying too.
Wonder what the emotional response thing has to do with increasing the chances of conversion. Larc??
IP: Hncxm7OSyt7iMuhQ
DannyBearRe: Social Influence Part I, II
larc,

I wont cite books or studies, my time and inclanations are not so inclined.

Finding a niche in society, or social structure, is a life long journey. All predicated on where you are, literally. Time, place, conditions, associates, all effecting the choices one makes. This social influence changes, regularly based upon current events.

It seems to be very easy for those (normaly non-violent) caught up in mob action of any sort, to strip themselves of formerly tightly held beliefs and participate in very violent acts. Peer preasure, when applied to young and old, is probably more responsible for changing peoples actions than any education, or indoctrination ever has.

The dynamics of this kind of social influence, can be seen even in the simpelist forms of communication or interchange. The dynamics of this discussion board, is rooted in peer presure.

You start to mix in 'sacred scripture', uncontestable words of authority, peoples hopes and dreams, along with group peer presure, you have a very powerful concoction. Thus enter religion, exercise this presure with mind numbing, repetitive indoctrination, you create literal walking zombies.

Thus the success of the WTBS, they are master's at blending peer presure, with 'spiritual' goads that just solidify the poor rank and files adherence to 'the way'.

It took you and I 10yrs to shed the chain's. The power of this social reality 'peer presure' is exercised on us daily, even if we have a hard time recognizing it. Politicians, law enforcerment, governments, religions, all know how to work the 'crowds'....the crowds then exercise thier power, even if they do not realize it.

So it is always good imo, to review your stance, your conclusions, to see if you have not been overly influenced by the 'crowds'.

Thanks for inviting me over to your thread.

Danny
IP: tPfH4Uo3dyRts7cw
larcRe: Social Influence Part I, II
Hey Danny,

I wouldn't expect you to quote studies. There is a reason I can do it. From 1986 until the end of 1999, I explained this to students for a total of about 40 times, so the stuff is pretty much burned into my brain.

After reading your comments, it occurred to me that as a result of my JW experience, I never was a "joiner" for the rest of my life. This may have hurt my career, since I was not big on "networking" as they call it but I did OK and OK is good enough for me.
IP: E3A9yNDRBp6Q+//m
sleepyRe: Social Influence Part I, II
Thank for the useful insights.

It is obvious when we think of it that humans feel comfortable conforming to groups.
Not many people are comfortable with being different , usually "different" people are seen as odd or a bit mad.
And if we are honest with ourselves most of us find it difficult to get on with people who are too diferent to us.
IP: uch4F3ChFGXwcalr
teejayRe: Social Influence Part I, II
Larc,

Thanks for sharing these studies with us. I would have enjoyed being a student in your class... I just love this stuff!!

Using teenagers, not long ago one of the newsmagazine shows (Dateline or maybe 20/20) did a demonstration that copied Asch's experiment that caused one kid to act in a way that he knew was wrong. I don't remember exactly what the test was, but I DO remember how deeply sad for him it made me feel. I really can't say why, only that the kid lacked enough strength to stand against the tide of peer pressure. I understand how that truth of human nature applies in a congregational setting involving men who are pressured to conform to decisions they know in their hearts are wrong. Elders are humans, too.

In Jr. High we briefly went over Zimbardo's study involving students that play-acted as either jailors or prisoners. The implication you pointed to, that the role you are in greatly affects your behavior, clearly applies in the case of elders. It would be good to make every single elder aware of these two studies. Of course, that would defeat the purpose of the governing body. As it is with the military, little is accomplished if everyone is a free thinker, able to decide on the importance of every directive.

As I mentioned to Ginny in the other thread, I don't judge the elders. Amnesian simply made the case that elders are accountable for what they do. Yes they are victims like everybody else, but they should be very aware of the implications of the two studies you have cited here. I wish I had the answer. I don't.

I was an active, believing Witness, never advancing above "publisher," for more than thirty years. Still, I tended to not act as an average publisher. I have a serious streak of non-conformity, rebellion, whatever you want to call it. Even so, I hate to think... and I mean that... I hate to think of the man I might have become had I reached elder status and lived under the pressure of the social influences these men studied.

If I had, I'd prefer to now be like my friend Danny and simply say, "I was wrong. I'm sorry. I will try to do better from here on out."
IP: eDcBg1QBwhTH0gYj
waitingRe: Social Influence Part I, II
Howdy Larc,

Fine discussions happening here and other threads. Thanks for your insight. The below sites came across my way upon first coming on the net - I found them fascinating with the implications on how the human mind works in captivity and/or power capacity.

I really believe that the blame, the victims, the circumstances, can't be said to be black/white, he/she, them/us.
There are just too many variations to the mind.

Milgram's experiment on "Obedience to Authority"

.. http://designweb.otago.ac.nz/grant/psyc/OBEDIANCE.HTML

Quote: Although no-one actually received any electric shocks, Milgram's study came under fire for the adverse it had on the "teachers". Milgram's interviews with his subjects tended to confirm the view that ordinary everyday people can cause pain and suffering to another person under the right set of circumstances. Milgram recounts one interview in particular with a devout Catholic married to a plumber... According to Milgram she gave the impression of complete humility. At 225 volts she turned to the experimenter and in a tentative voice said "I hesitate to press these". But when the experimented told her to continue, she did. Later she hesitated again, but once again, when the experimenter insisted that she continue, she did... right up to the maximum 450 volt shock."

Societal Stockholm Syndrome

.. http://web2.airmail.net/ktrig246/out_of_cave/sss.html

Quote: The Stockholm incident compelled journalists and social scientists to research whether the emotional bonding between captors and captives was a "freak" incident or a common occurrence in oppressive situations. They discovered that it's such a common phenomenon that it deserves a name. Thus the label, Stockholm Syndrome, was born. It has happened to concentration camp prisoners, cult members, civilians in Chinese Communist prisons, pimp-procured prostitutes, incest victims, physically and/or emotionally abused children, battered women, prisoners of war, victims of hijackings, and of course, hostages. Virtually anyone can get Stockholm Syndrome it the following conditions are met:

1. Perceived threat to survival and the belief that one's captor is willing to act on that threat

2. The captive's perception of small kindnesses from the captor within a context of terror

3. Isolation from perspectives other than those of the captor

4. Perceived inability to escape.

Stockholm Syndrome is a survival mechanism. The men and women who get it are not lunatics. They are fighting for their lives. They deserve compassion, not ridicule.

waiting

ps: Did zazu tell you I was following in your footsteps in school? Lol......I took a class at 8am - told the counselor that I'd have a pretty good chance (grading on the curve) since most students would either still be asleep or hungover. He looked at me funny (not unusal), and I explained I had two sons in college. He went "ahhhhhhh."
IP: MuZEL9xQ69GRPIaB
larcRe: Social Influence Part I, II
Waiting,

Thank you for providing the site that fully describes the Milgram study. That saved me some time and the link provides much more detail than I would have in my summary.

Wish you well on your academic journey. I found that journey to be wonderful. You can have some bumps along the way, boring teachers, boring subjects, overwhelming assignments, but overall it still is terrific, as I think, Teejay can attest.

Teejay,

Thank you for that very nice compliment about wishing you would have been in my classes. That means a lot to me.
IP: E3A9yNDRBp6Q+//m
waitingRe: Social Influence Part I, II
well, hell, larc, I wish I could be in your classes too!

Alas.......Ohio a couple of years past is just too far away....even for my mind!

Glad I could be of service on the quotes.

My son told me not to be too talkative in a "101" class as they're designed to "go by the book" and the other kids wouldn't like me. Lol, like I care.....but they could key my car, so I'll be quiet.

waiting
IP: MuZEL9xQ69GRPIaB
teejayRe: Social Influence Part I, II
Thank you for these site, Waiting. Interesting in the extreme. God I love this board!!

What these researchers learned about human nature is very disturbing:
Milgram's interviews with his subjects tended to confirm the view that ordinary everyday people can cause pain and suffering to another person under the right set of circumstances.
To me it says that questioning authority is a very important and necessary component of a well-balanced personality. These links would be an important addition to AMNESIAN's thread.

Peace,
tj
IP: VtcIBlVabxN05+wF
JTRe: Social Influence Part I, II
Phillip Zimbardo -


he is the man- i enjoyed watching the videos about him and his test

my wife and i were introduced to him thru video when we started college we too saw him on the Ed Channel

great guy

james
IP: xpOoDmwR6YkdTw/U
larcRe: Social Influence Part I, II
I brought this back for Hillary and others who may have missed it the first time.

While I am here, I thought I would add a couple comments. Milgam's study clearly shows the difference between what people say they will do and what they actually will do. Most people might say, "Well, if I was an elder, I won't do such and such." Really?? Are you sure? Most students said they would disobey authority (96%), yet the majority (60%) continued the shocks beyond the point of the "learners" loud screams to point that it appeared that the learner was unconscious. Although many students showed great anxiety, they continued. Why? Because they had given over their personal responsibility to authority, just as a publisher gives it up to the elder, and the elder gives it up to the DO, etc, on up the line.

When I first read the studies of Sherif, Asch, Zimbardo, and Milgram, I truely humbled regarding the powerful forces that shape our lives.

Waiting,

My advice regarding questions in class has more to do with the prof than it does the students. Some profs like interactivity and lots of questions. I always did. Some like to talk for long periods with no break in their concentration, with questions at the end. You have to size up the profs. Forget what other students think. It's your tuition dollars and your education.
IP: E3A9yNDRBp6Q+//m