MemberPostViewed: times
journey-onRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....


J-O, I think Gopher is more concerned for the welfare of others than himself

Snowbird...you are a sweetheart and I always read your posts.  I hope you weren't implying that I am not concerned for the

welfare of others just because I verbalized my own contentment. 

You have to start with your OWN life.  When you make your life happy and prosperous, you are in a better position to help

others find the same.  I pay taxes....lots of them.  I want my taxes to go toward the betterment of the whole country in a

well-thought-out balance that includes all our needs, not just the needs of a particular segment.  I also believe in personal

charitable donations to causes that are near and dear to me that perhaps aren't covered as much as I would like through

the divisions of the tax pie. 

I like what Jesus said:  Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.  Teach him to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.

I know it's overused, but for good reason.

IP: DURusQ7jsyFdCYvN
snowbirdRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....

Snowbird...you are a sweetheart and I always read your posts.  I hope you weren't implying that I am not concerned for the

welfare of others just because I verbalized my own contentment

As I always do yours.

No, of course not!

Sylvia

IP: 5EJbIu+cBgHC/lgT
GopherRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....

Hi J-O,

My concerns are about our country, and the erosion of the middle-class as well as the erosion of civil liberties. As you stated, things are like a pendulum and hopefully they will swing back. A recent poll said 81% of Americans feel this country is on the wrong track. So I am not alone in my concerns.

While we may have different outlooks on some things, I wholeheartedly endorse what you wrote here:

I want my taxes to go toward the betterment of the whole country in a well-thought-out balance that includes all our needs, not just the needs of a particular segment.

Some of my postings on the forum may come across as dyed-in-the-wool liberal (and add in the fact that I recently came out as atheist -- I must really be off my rocker).

But I am at heart a centrist, or I am really trying to be. I believe that America is like an eagle with two wings -- and it needs both its right and left wing working to fly straight. America has greatly benefited from progressive ideas which got it out of previous centuries' type thinking. However it needs the conservative wing to make sure that the changes the country makes are pragmatic, we can't let government get out of control.

Since the early 1980's the country has shifted right-ward. During much of that time though, there was a counterbalance between the executive and legislative branches. i.e., one being majority Democratic and the other being majority Republican. However in the early part of this decade both the White House and Congress have been controlled by the right, and we've seen the implementation of many neoconservative ideas.

IMHO the country moved so far right, that we now need to veer left to get back to the middle. And that's what we're likely to see during this upcoming presidential election.

IP: 6LGQSDWM/EwVRtXL by Gopher: Correct formatting
BurnTheShipsRe: Re: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....
IMHO the country swang so far right, that we now need to veer left to get back to the middle. And that's what we're likely to see during this upcoming presidential election.

No doubt.

We have a centrist Republican (McCain). A centrist Democrat (Clinton) and a very leftist Democrat (Obama) in the running.

This country is not turning to the right next term.

BTS

IP: SijFAYa5i7tjiifC
BurnTheShipsRe: Re: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....
I like what Jesus said:  Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.  Teach him to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.

Poverty begins between the ears.

There's an old Jewish refrain that says "Raise a son without teaching him a trade, and you are raising a thief".

BTS

IP: SijFAYa5i7tjiifC
SixofNineRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....

I like what Jesus said:  Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.  Teach him to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.

 

 

What I don't get, is why any self identified "conservative" or Republican would ever have the gall to quote that?

 It's been so VERY long since any Republican made a proposal to "teach a man to fish".  Because to do that, you'd have to actually set up a program for for doing just that.  OMG! A program?  :shock: :horror:

 "Wait a second, you want to do WHAT???? You want to give that poor man a basic, dependable, beginner fishing kit???????????????  Why you lazy teat-sucking socialist!  And BAIT?  wtf?  You want to give this poor destitute person BAIT?  Why, my grandfather tied his own flies! I have them in a glass case somewhere, because I'm such a brilliant conservative investor... see, I'm investing by saving the stuff passed on to me by my betters, ancestors... brilliant eh? Oh yeah, back to those poor schmucks who don't know how to fish..."

 

"Uh, say now, look'here, if we pass legislation that provides for a tax credit for first time fishermen's gear, I could provide the US Taxpayer with a bang-up fishing kit through my contacts in China.  Yeah, maybe we should expand this program.  I'll head it up, and it will be an economic boon (to me), we'll keep government small too, so's none a' them nasty ole regulaters come sniffin' around this here bi-partisan good thing I got going on (bipartisan: me and my rich Chinese friends, heh heh).

"Now then, my little lie-beral friend, you're going to need textbooks to teach, right?  Well did I tell you about the textbook company my friend owns?....."

.....ad infinitum, with lots of complaints about how the government that they have so royally fucked up, is so royally fucked up. 

 

 Conservatives. Even their name implies smallness.



 

IP: dWxLaNPC11v9Tw1v
journey-onRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....

 

I like what Jesus said:  Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.  Teach him to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.

What I don't get, is why any self identified "conservative" or Republican would ever have the gall to quote that?

 It's been so VERY long since any Republican made a proposal to "teach a man to fish".  Because to do that, you'd have to actually set up a program for for doing just that.  OMG! A program?  :shock: :horror:

 "Wait a second, you want to do WHAT???? You want to give that poor man a basic, dependable, beginner fishing kit???????????????  Why you lazy teat-sucking socialist!  And BAIT?  wtf?  You want to give this poor destitute person BAIT?  Why, my grandfather tied his own flies! I have them in a glass case somewhere, because I'm such a brilliant conservative investor... see, I'm investing by saving the stuff passed on to me by my betters, ancestors... brilliant eh? Oh yeah, back to those poor schmucks who don't know how to fish..."

"Uh, say now, look'here, if we pass legislation that provides for a tax credit for first time fishermen's gear, I could provide the US Taxpayer with a bang-up fishing kit through my contacts in China.  Yeah, maybe we should expand this program.  I'll head it up, and it will be an economic boon (to me), we'll keep government small too, so's none a' them nasty ole regulaters come sniffin' around this here bi-partisan good thing I got going on (bipartisan: me and my rich Chinese friends, heh heh).

"Now then, my little lie-beral friend, you're going to need textbooks to teach, right?  Well did I tell you about the textbook company my friend owns?....."

.....ad infinitum, with lots of complaints about how the government that they have so royally fucked up, is so royally fucked up. 

Spoken like a true ill-informed- foaming-at-the-mouth-seeing-one-side-only mouth-off.

Even with your elaborate example of dear ole grampa, you still sound like the above description.

Republicans and conservatives are NOT against programs....they're just against stupidly planned

ones that never get the job done that just keep going on and on and on with no real qualitative results.

We HAVE to cooperate to effect real results with some of these "programs", but unfortunately the people

you have to cooperate with are so (see description above) that they just continue as always, ad infinitum.

 

IP: DURusQ7jsyFdCYvN
journey-onRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....

I promised myself I would not get into these types of discussions.  

I'm going to cut and run on this thread....sorry if that sounds unfair but I don't want to say too much.

I really do "love" you all....liberals, conservative, Demos, Rep, and those undecided.  Different strokes

for different folks and I don't want ill will to ruin my otherwise beautiful day.  .........Journey-on

IP: DURusQ7jsyFdCYvN
SixofNineRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....

Republicans and conservatives are NOT against programs ....they're just against stupidly planned ones that never get the job done that just keep going on and on and on with no real qualitative results.

 

Horseshit. If that were true they'd be famous for working to fix programs that don't work as good as they could, and proposing new better programs to solve ever-changing problems.

 Republicans are famous for "heck of a job, Brownie" and the transfer of wealth from the poor and middle class to the already wealthy.

The problem isn't "conservativism" per se.  It's good to be conservative of things of real, lasting value.  The problem is taking a fairly positive concept for ones personal values, "conservativism", and making political ideology out of it.  It's a horrible, mean, stupid, opposed-to-expansion-that-benefits-newcomers political ideology.

 It's also antithetical to everything Jesus is written to have stood for.

It is as popular as it is because it appeals to the lesser angels of the human soul. 

Fortunately, I think even most "conservatives" are growing a bit tired of their own merde and are seeing the value of cleaning up their own house.


 

IP: dWxLaNPC11v9Tw1v
BurnTheShipsRe: Re: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....
It's also antithetical to everything Jesus is written to have stood for.

I would really love to see how you weasel that rationale.

God is a Libertarian. He forces no one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_libertarianism

Christian and Libertarian

Every week, someone asks me what it means to be a Christian Libertarian. Almost as often, I hear from Republicans disgusted with their party's abandonment of its purported principles of small government, social conservatism and adherence to the Constitution, who are nevertheless afraid of switching their allegiance to the godless Libertarians.

It has been said that a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged. In like manner, a libertarian is a conservative who's been mugged by the government. There is no criminal gang or collection of scam artists who perpetrate even a small fraction of the crimes that the federal government commits and abets – from the forgeries and inflationary confiscations of the U.S. Treasury to the cowardly corruption of the judiciary, from the extra-Constitutional executive orders of the president to the treasonous signings-away of national sovereignty by Congress.

One need not be an atheist or a devotee of Shub-Niggurath to oppose these things. Indeed, I suspect the problem many Christians and conservative Republicans have with making the leap to Libertarianism is that they still see a connection between the concepts of legality and morality. But there is no inherent relationship between the two; indeed, it is becoming increasingly obvious that it is not possible to honor both in many aspects of American life.

"It's the law!" is not a moral argument. It is an argument based on the threat of force. Yesterday the law required one to return an escaped slave to his owner; tomorrow it will require one to have an implanted Social Security number when one simply wants to buy Cheerios at the supermarket. The law is not only "an ass," but in a secular society, its moral neutrality is the best for which one can hope. And the law is impossible to obey, even for the most servile citizen – no one truly knows the laws because no one reads them, not even the politicians who pass them!

Then there are those conservatives who simply do not have a real commitment to individual freedom. They believe that government power is like a light switch, to be switched on to enforce policies they favor – such as banning private development on scenic lands – but switched off in the case of policies they do not. This is optimistic lunacy, since the argument for limited government does not rest upon the notion that the government always does undesirable things, but on the idea that if it can, it eventually will.

The same government that has the power to ban a private house on the beach also has the power to sell the beach to Wal-Mart or build a nuclear power plant on it. Since the Founding Fathers understood that a Marcus Aurelius was always followed by a Commodus, they tried to construct a system that would prevent either. Good central government, even when it exists, is a short-lived beast.

And Libertarianism is not inherently godless. In fact, it is the only political philosophy that is truly in accordance with Christianity. The Christian religion posits an all-powerful God who nevertheless permits humanity to turn its back on Him. This shows an extreme respect for free will and for the very sort of individual choice that is banned by Democrats and Republicans alike as they attempt to enforce their will upon the people through the power of government.

The basic principle of Libertarianism is not anarchic. There are real limits. My free will ends where yours begins. Neither the community nor I have any claim whatsoever on your property or your life, and a libertarian legal system would be structured around that principle. Do not be misled by the false "pro-choice" rhetoric of the infanticidal abortionettes; when one individual decides the fate of another, it is nothing more than the ancient law of tooth and claw. Still, their very terminology is the homage vice pays to virtue.

And what of the Christian element? Christianity is integral to the philosophy, as without the spiritual core of its demand for free will responsibility, libertarianism has a tendency to devolve into simple utilitarianism, which eventually leads to the very collectivism it was conceived to oppose. The occasional perversions of princes of the various churches notwithstanding, Christianity is timeless and so provides the inexhaustible spring of moral refreshment that is necessary to any political ideology that hopes to resist corruption over time.

To love Jesus Christ and individual freedom; that is what it means to be a Christian Libertarian.

BTS

IP: SijFAYa5i7tjiifC by BurnTheShips: Correct formatting
by BurnTheShips: Correct formatting
PrimateDaveRe: Re: Re: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....
"I liked Ron Paul, until I suspected he was an antisemite and a white racist." - BTS

Not meant as a criticism, just a quick observation. People in the public eye are often branded "anti-semite" when they openly denounce Zionism. One can be (and in my opinion should be) anti-Zionist without being against Jewish people in any way, shape, or form. As for the accusations against Ron Paul, I have no idea.

Dave
IP: L6uAcYobKt8tiq8A
beksbksRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....

Six you hit so many nails on the head in that one, you deserve a beer.  And it was good sarcastic fun to boot.

 

IP: yPPncnj+GP+iboQV
beksbksRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....
I haven't looked at your charts and graphs thoroughly yet Burn, but I can't help but wonder if the No Child Left Behind Act is part of that education budget increase.  This is an old article.  We now know that NCLBA is a failure.  Oh but not for Neil.
 
 
Published on Sunday, October 22, 2006 by the Los Angeles Times
Bush's Family Profits from 'No Child' Act
by Walter F. Roche Jr.
 

A company headed by President Bush's brother and partly owned by his parents is benefiting from Republican connections and federal dollars targeted for economically disadvantaged students under the No Child Left Behind Act.


NEIL BUSH: He says Ignite’s growth is not due to political influence. (David Kohl / AP)
With investments from his parents, George H.W. and Barbara Bush, and other backers, Neil Bush's company, Ignite! Learning, has placed its products in 40 U.S. school districts and now plans to market internationally.

At least 13 U.S. school districts have used federal funds available through the president's signature education reform, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, to buy Ignite's portable learning centers at $3,800 apiece.

The law provides federal funds to help school districts better serve disadvantaged students and improve their performance, especially in reading and math.

But Ignite does not offer reading instruction, and its math program will not be available until next year.

The federal Department of Education does not monitor individual school district expenditures under the No Child program, but sets guidelines that the states are expected to enforce, spokesman Chad Colby said.

Ignite executive Tom Deliganis said that "some districts seem to feel OK" about using No Child money for the Ignite purchases, "and others do not."

Entire LA Times article here http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1022-02.htm
IP: yPPncnj+GP+iboQV
beksbksRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....
Journey,
I really do "love" you all....liberals, conservative, Demos, Rep, and those undecided

but how about this guy?  You "love" him too?

a true ill-informed- foaming-at-the-mouth-seeing-one-side-only mouth-off.
IP: yPPncnj+GP+iboQV
sammielee24Re: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....

1)  Raise taxes, and not just capital gains.  Income taxes will be raised as well.  And if you make more than $200k/yr, you are "rich", and defined as such you will get SOAKED; thus, you will have little incentive to keep earning what you do now,--the opportunity to make a nice profit will simply not be there....And all of us working stiffs fortunate enough to make over $50 k/ yr, you better hold on to your wallets as well... we are going to pay for the social security bailout

Raising taxes by re-writing the tax code - good idea.

       2)  Nationalize health insurance.  We're going to cover EVERYONE, including illegals/immigrants--guess who's going to pay for it?  Remember, there's no such thing as a free lunch.  Someone has to pay...It ain't gonna be the super rich, and the poor certainly cannot pay for it.  Yup, you're right--those of us in the middle, working class will be footing the bill

Good. Everyone should be covered. If you have a law in place that places a heavy fine on corporations or employers using illegal workers then enforce it or get it off the books. Sure someone has to pay. Big deal. It would cost less in the long run to have nationalized health care than it costs now and your citizens would be healthier for it.

3)  Draw down troops and eventually withdraw from all military involvement in the Middle East.  The mullahs in Iran are counting the days....They love Obama!

The occupation and it's cost has a direct effect on both the morale and economy of the country. A loss of 4500 American lives, 9 trillion dollar debt, no secure region, displaced Iraqi's - what is to be gained in remaining?

4)  pass the "card check" unionization bill--no more secret ballot, as has always been the case up till now in votes, union thugs will be able to intimidate and coerce people into voting for union representation because now they will know which workers are not on the 'list', and thus they can apply pressure and coercion tactics.

Yeah!!!! Yeah!!! Union busting - I believe the US figures are something like 3,500 people who have been fired for even attempting to get a union in place ...and yet we fight for democracy?

5)   Want to 'engage' and talk with countries and leaders that openly hate us and show us no respect, like Hugo Chavez, Amejinad(sp?) in Iran, Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe, Bashar Assad in Syria, etc..etc...Bottom line, if he's a dictator, Obama wants to talk, make nice, and negotiate with you.

Respect is usually earned not just given. Perhaps negotiation might be a start - force hasn't been. I'm not even certain that you can say that the country is hated - could it be that the anger is toward the leader and policy? Maybe it will come down to negotiation combined with some ramification for non compliance or even force - who knows?

6)  grow government and the welfare state to a size that cannot be even imagined right now.  Bush as a republican did a bad enough job enlarging the size of our federal government, under Obama it will exponentially get even bigger.

Governments are voted by the people for the people. Use the government to benefit you. If you don't like what they do - find a way to change it.

7)pass more regulation and red tape to hamstring business in the name of 'helping the workers'--which in turn will only drive away investment and jobs...

Yeah!!!! Regulation. I love that word. Deregulation is in large part why you ended up with the banking mess. Deregulation has created monopolies who own the government - break them up and drive the prices down. Deregulation in the markets is why your commodities are spiraling out of control as investors bid and keep the prices high. I say go back to regulating it all and start over....

Roosevelt didn't have all the answers but thanks to his efforts, the middle class was able to grow into a secure, healthy population - quite unlike the shadow of middle class that exists today - and while they are at it - regulate the credit card industry and banking industry to halt criminal interest rates and service charges....

 brought Roosevelt to the nation's highest office. Over the next seven years, he worked tirelessly to promote social and governmental reform, often relying on his executive authority to implement programs that would have been rejected by the conservative forces that controlled Congress. He revived the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890 to break up some of the country's biggest corporations and restore competition to the business world. Later, he secured passage of federal regulations to control railroad rates and to set quality standards for foods and drugs. In foreigh affairs, he extended the Monroe Doctrine by asserting the United States' exclusive right to police international relations in the Western Hemisphere. He also precipitated a revolution that separated Panama from Columbia and cleared the way for construction of the Panama Canal.
Democrats!! Go Dems! sammieswife.
IP: 2z+XhBjEa4QvTufc
GopherRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....

Sammieswife, you make many good points.

I liked the last one about Teddy Roosevelt and his progressive ideas that brought America into the 20th century. Actually, wasn't he a Republican? Good ideas can come from either party. I do wish more Republicans and Democrats these days were like Teddy.

IP: 6LGQSDWM/EwVRtXL
beksbksRe: Re: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....

Gopher, Teddy was the last of the good ones.

THE ROUGH RIDER TAKES ON THE ROBBER BARONS

"We Republicans [must] hold the just balance and set ourselves as resolutely against improper corporate influence on the one hand as against demagogy and mob rule on the other."
Theodore Roosevelt

The former president began to speak with a bullet lodged in his chest.

Less than five minutes before, a deranged gunman had shot Theodore Roosevelt at close range as he walked to give a speech on behalf of his bid to recapture the White House in 1912 as a Progressive. Aides insisted that Roosevelt head straight to the hospital, but flush with a sense of destiny, the old lion refused. He would not retreat; he would give this speech if it killed him. With the blood spreading against his white shirt, he began:

I have altogether too important things to think of to feel any concern over my own death. . . . I am ahead of the game anyway. No man has had a happier life than I have led. . . .

This effort to assassinate me emphasizes to a peculiar degree the need for the Progressive movement . . . every good citizen ought to do everything in his or her power to prevent the coming of the day when we shall see in this country two recognized creeds fighting one another, when we shall see the creed of the "Have-nots" arraigned against the creed of the "Haves" . . .

My appeal for organized labor is two-fold; to the outsider and the capitalist I make my appeal to treat the laborer fairly . . . That is one-half appeal that I make. Now, the other half is to the labor man himself. My appeal to him is to remember that as he wants justice, so he must do justice.

The rest of the article here  http://www.independentnation.org/theodore_roosevelt.htm


IP: yPPncnj+GP+iboQV
beksbksRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....

Go Sammieswife!

Hey girl, don't you think it's time you had an identity beyond that of your husbands wife? 

IP: yPPncnj+GP+iboQV
jaguarbassRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....

 

The future doesnt look promising. The next democrat president will have been Bushwacked and have a mess to deal with.

If McCain wins he will be Bush.5

Bush was not a conservative he spent out the ying yang. He just doesnt have the balls to tax for his spending which bankrupts Amerika.

He shouldnt have allowed us to be attacked and he shouldnt have gone chasing the boogie man.

Before we were attacked he had a deplorable record of spending time doing presidential things like protecting the national security his number 1 job and priority.

He spent more time on vacation than anyone since his fellow Bushwacker father was in office.

It's obvious he wasnt protecting national security on the golf course.

What are we doing in Iraq if Osama Bin Ladin was responsible for 911.

All information indicates that Sadam Hussien and Bin Ladin were Adversaries.

What ever happened to the war on terror and capturing Bin Ladin.

Do you have a 2 week memory like Bush and all the politicians figure?

In my opinion we have 3 bad choices for president.

McCain being the baddest in a way that is not good.

Clinton is too dingy and puts her foot in her mouth too often and even if you discont that, it doesnt appear that she is going to win the primary.

Which leaves us Obama vs McCain.

Where bank rupt sliding into a depression now with Bush and McCanin is going to go full tilt behind Bush. McCain is  Bush point 5.

The Bush family came up with the great Nafta plan which sucked all of the jobs out of the US.

Which is why we are in a recession now. You cant run a country when you dont produce anything.

If all of the jobs are service jobs, you have no one to tax. Because no one is making anything.

Servants serve workers, producers. It doesnt work everyone being a server.

If countries could be prosperous selling insurance and service, Africa would not be a third world country.

America used to make things cars, tractors, trucks, tools, musical instruments, televisions, airplanes, refrigerators. computers. Boat motors. All that stuff has gone out of the country.

We have a country of scam artist trying to scam other scam artist. Kind of like Nigeria and all the desperate e mails they send out to get their millions out of Nigeria into your bank account.

Telemarketing and boiler rooms the new american business model.

Telemarketing the new growth industry.

And to top that off the government has come up with a do not call at home list of numbers to stiffle our new growth industry of tele marketing and they wonder why we are in a recession.

They dont wonder. They manipulated it.

IP: LkbBgnE+RzaAyJYf
passive suicideRe: President Obama and a Democrat Congress Will....
Well my friend............................... I can't possibly see how taxes can be raised even more.......... bravo for universal health care.... it's about frikkin time.... We should have NEVER been in the middle east.....what do you think all your taxes are paying for RIGHT NOW? Workers need a boost.... I must say I would prefer a FLAT TAX with minimal paperwork....mostly on purchased goods....that way EVERYONE PAYS!!!! Rich, and illegal! I think you are a large bizz owner who has a lot ta lose to a pres. that wants to level the playing field, and take out the special interest groups who are profiting from the war, gas, health care hmo's, and a very low minimum wage........ bastard comes to mind..... or republican...either one.
IP: v/WtCgvrWtIvQl1F