... I don't want to be conclusive.Thank you, Charles.When it comes to Russell and the infancy of the WTS, we can prove many
things conclusively. The written record and historical evidence is quite clear.Was Russell a Mason? I didn't and still don't think it can be proven
conclusively whether he was or not. Period. That being so,
I personally will refrain from saying that he absolutely was or was not a
Mason. Others can do what they wish... I have no problem with that. What I DO have a problem with is others (still here, MadApostate? And
you are quite mad, you understand) beating me over the head when they are
in no better position than I am but wish to either browbeat me into their
way of thinking or attempt to belittle or condescend when I choose to see
things differently. It was almost as if HE had traveled back to the early
1900s and discovered hidden truths, unavailable to the rest of us. Not so.Keep us posted, Chasson, on your further research. I say again, "Good work."
things conclusively. The written record and historical evidence is quite clear.Was Russell a Mason? I didn't and still don't think it can be proven
conclusively whether he was or not. Period. That being so,
I personally will refrain from saying that he absolutely was or was not a
Mason. Others can do what they wish... I have no problem with that. What I DO have a problem with is others (still here, MadApostate? And
you are quite mad, you understand) beating me over the head when they are
in no better position than I am but wish to either browbeat me into their
way of thinking or attempt to belittle or condescend when I choose to see
things differently. It was almost as if HE had traveled back to the early
1900s and discovered hidden truths, unavailable to the rest of us. Not so.Keep us posted, Chasson, on your further research. I say again, "Good work."