1) the branch could support her though...although i do wonder if as she is a member, it could be taken as an organisation-i will ask...
2) yes, but they sought the court order, and are therefore ultimatly responsible
3) this is where the sister may have not presented the facts, and therefore the hospital and courts did not have the full facts and were therefore working off the facts at hand.
4a) it is ireland, not eire-no one here ever refers to it as such :-)
4b) yes it is the same, but judges are seen as part of the political appartus and therefore any lawsuit would be against "the state"
5) the case would be on assault, and the taking away of her human rights, breach of religious freedom, breach of freedom of medical treatment and authority over her own body.
6a) ireland, not eire
6b) legal aid is quite easy to get, all refugee's are afforded legal aid, however i suspect the society are going to get a HR lawyer involved in this and therefore the "world wide work" will probably be paying-although because it is such a constitutional issue, most lawyers do this work "pro-bono" as it will make a name for themselves
7) see #6- the constitutional implications of the case are far more public than the fact she is a witness.
2) yes, but they sought the court order, and are therefore ultimatly responsible
3) this is where the sister may have not presented the facts, and therefore the hospital and courts did not have the full facts and were therefore working off the facts at hand.
4a) it is ireland, not eire-no one here ever refers to it as such :-)
4b) yes it is the same, but judges are seen as part of the political appartus and therefore any lawsuit would be against "the state"
5) the case would be on assault, and the taking away of her human rights, breach of religious freedom, breach of freedom of medical treatment and authority over her own body.
6a) ireland, not eire
6b) legal aid is quite easy to get, all refugee's are afforded legal aid, however i suspect the society are going to get a HR lawyer involved in this and therefore the "world wide work" will probably be paying-although because it is such a constitutional issue, most lawyers do this work "pro-bono" as it will make a name for themselves
7) see #6- the constitutional implications of the case are far more public than the fact she is a witness.