This could be very interesting.
In my humble (and layman's) opinion:
1. WTBTS/the dubs could not be a party to the litigation - it would have to be the woman concerned as sole plaintiff
2. The medical authorities would have an unassailable defence against a suit for assault because they were acting in accordance with a court order
3. Possible suit against the medical authorities for misrepresentation/negligence in collecting and presenting the evidence to the court when applying for the order? Difficult to prove, i would have thought.
4. If the legal position in Eire is the same as in UK, individual judges etc. cannot be sued for their judicial decisions
5. Possibly an action in a higher court (or Eurpean Court) for breach of the woman's human rights under ECHR? Possible, but on what basis could she ask for damages/compensation? And the breach has now finished if it existed at all so she couldn't sue for an order to desist (ceriatori?)
6. I don't know anything about the Legal Aid system in Eire, but suspect she may have difficulty in getting funding.
7. I can't see that WTBTS would fund her. The publicity surrounding this case could, I suspect, be enough to outweigh the JW's efforts in door-to-door work for years to come.