(post 2903011) in Beliefs, Doctrine & Practices

Member	Post

If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by Olin Moyles Ghost on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by Awakened at Gilead on

Re: Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in by Olin Moyles Ghost on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by garybuss on

Re: Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by Quandry on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by AuldSoul on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by oompa on

Re: Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by Awakened at Gilead on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by GermanXJW on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by oompa on

Re: Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by Awakened at Gilead on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by Honesty on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by garybuss on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by yadda yadda 2 on

AuldSoul Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918?

yadda_yadda,
If you read carefully-er, you will find that there was no appointment whatsoever. There was a prediction of one possible appointment and two identifications, neither of which were of necessity to occur, but either of which could occur. Each identification was predicated upon a certain set of conditions. Neither of these sets must be met. Therefore, the resulting appointment from one of the identifications is also not required as a fulfillment . . . this wasn't a prophecy, it was counsel.
IP: B9om881wED/IapjL

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by yadda yadda 2 on

Re: Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by AuldSoul on

Re: Re: Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by watson on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918 by Borgia on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by stillajwexelder on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by RubaDub on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by yadda yadda 2 on

Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918? by AuldSoul on

AuldSoul	Re: If the FDS was appointed in 33 C.E., then why did Jesus inspect in 1918?
	yadda_yadda, If you read carefully-er, you will find that there was no appointment whatsoever. There was a prediction of one possible appointment and two identifications, neither of which were of necessity to occur, but either of which could occur. Each identification was predicated upon a certain set of conditions. Neither of these sets must be met. Therefore, the resulting appointment from one of the identifications is also not required as a fulfillment . . . this wasn't a prophecy, it was counsel.
IP: B9om881wED/IapjL