I notice that everything they want the speaker to say is in the outline. They admonish the speaker to adhere closely to the outline. First, they want the speaker to take all of three minutes to bash the existing governments (some of which do indeed deserve to be bashed, but not for the listed reasons).
Now, the next 16 minutes are full of the supposed benefits of the Kingdom. Here are some of the real benefits: Poverty, stagnation, people working more than 18 hours a day, 7 days a week and sacrificing more than 90% of the fruitage of their labor to some higher cause, people not being optimally satisfied or fulfilled, and no personal accomplishments. They will lie about people being happy under the listed conditions, when the truth is that most people would stagnate. And, instead of people properly taking all the credit for the good they accomplish, they give that to God.
Now, what would actually happen if Jesus were to rule the earth? Remember, Jesus wanted to free people from the religious system (and the political system that was also keeping mankind from reaching its full potential). I have reason to believe that Jesus, if he were actually ruling, would have the policy of no initiatory force or fraud. That includes the Watchtower Society (look what Jesus did to the religious leaders that were initiating force and fraud--he didn't tolerate it for long!). And, people would be able to rightly take credit for what they produce and create. That is not what the Watchtower Society wants people to think about this kingdom.
There is one possible type of person that is able to successfully fix our governments (and, Ted Jaracz is NOT in that class). The person would have to take a stand against all the regulators that are usurping their power. The Federal Reserve system has to go. So do most of the government regulatory agencies (not to worry: the private sector can regulate things by evaluating products and posting the results, which would force companies to fix Not Acceptable products). This person would also have to pass an amendment explicitly banning another power from ever growing such out of control regulators again. Funding for such groups would be totally eliminated. Eventually, the free market would, out of pure competition, fix all the problems that man has gotten in.
Don't think that is possible? Look at what science is doing today, even with the FDA in the way, about aging. Back 10 years ago, they didn't have much idea about what causes aging. Now they are getting a handle on it. Look at the computer industry: back in 1970, a 4 kB system was unaffordable except for the very rich. Now, 4 kB is laughable--we are looking at 4 GB systems in the $2,000 price range. I believe that such moves are entirely feasible wholly through the free market system, and would be provided by the free market given half a chance.
Don't look for that solution to be given at the Kingdumb Hells!