MemberPost
"Library Card" Defense refuted by hooberus on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by Euphemism on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by hawkaw on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by hawkaw on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by hooberus on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by Swan on

OdradeRe: "Library Card" Defense refuted


seems to me there's a difference between acquiesce (as in the case of the political party card,) and support (as in the NGO application.)

My dictionary defines acquiescense to: submit or comply silently without protest, (or in legal terms): failure to take legal proceedings, thereby implying the abandonment of a right. (Random House Webster's College dic.)

I don't get "unquestioning support" out of "acquiescence":
Were they to identify themselves as giving unquestioning support to any politcal arrangement, they would be acting contrary to the Bible's teaching that all human governmental systems exist by God's toleration only until such time as he chooses to replace them by his kingdom in the hands of Jesus Christ.
Odrade
IP: rgEnWYmf6hhhMpTx

Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by waiting on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by happyout on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by waiting on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by undercover on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by waiting on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by lurk on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by hawkaw on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by run dont walk on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by drwtsn32 on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by heathen on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by Jourles on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by lulu on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by hooberus on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by lurk on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by hawkaw on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by hawkaw on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by waiting on
Re: "Library Card" Defense refuted by hooberus on