I find this ruling extremely disappointing, to say the least. I was truly hoping that the judge would be presented with adequate evidence to rule in favor of the girls. The sad thing is, this decision is likely based on the simple fact that if the witnesses are recognized as ministers ( such as recognized to perform marriages), then all "benefits" of that station apply, including the right to not reveal information to law enforcement. It is an unfortunate ruling, to be sure, and I hope that it is remedied during the appeals process.
I definitely feel that priviledge should NOT extend in matters such as this, and that the simple fact that the elders claim minister status, but never fail to fall back on being "imperfect, untrained men" should automatically disqualify them from using the argument that they are ministers and entitled to not reveal what is "confessed." I do not think they should be able to have it both ways and use whichever excuse is convenient.