Third has been known to be caught in 'half-truths"..... Like the Amy B's case, he proudly in bold face declares the dismissal of her case against the WTS (NY/PA) but fails to mention that before Love merged this case with Napa's the case against the Elders of the Amarillo KH was not dismissed nor set to be dismissed. To Third the local KHs and Elders are not part of the WTS, yet we as JWs and Ex-JWs know differently. The Elders did receive a letter from the other KH that the he was a confessed pedophile. This is also the case where WTS lawyers argued the ELders have no fiduciary responsibilities (notably absent from Thirds comments about the Amy B case)
Here take a look at his arguement...it is nicely presented but.... http://www.thirdwitness.com/childabuse/AmyB.html
Fiduciary Responsibilit... http://www.e-watchman.com/commentaries/do-watchtower-elders-have-a-fiduciary-responsibility.html
Of course we all know what happened in Napa, the case was settled not long after the Judge hinted he would allow supoenas for the WT database of KH sex offenders. Barbara Anderson when requesting information was accidently sent some of the settlement financial agreement and informed the media. You can read what Barbara has said on this forum by looking at her topics & posts
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/member/18048.ashx
Again his site is nicely presented but scratch the surface a little harder with your own research and you will find half truths and a lot of white wash.