Well i will try to make me more understand:

1/ This association has been taking place after 2001 and the brutal end of the UN-DPI/Watchtower association, so the Watchtower was at this time well aware of the moral implication of collaboration with one of the UN agency.
2/ The IAPSO (Inter-Agency Procurement Services Office) was part at this time of the UNDP ( United Nations Development Program), so all ONG who had access to the facilities of IAPSO were partners of the UNDP, so it is really a clear collaboration to the UN policy and programs. (see for example: http://www.investindk.com/visCase.asp?artikelID=8212&print=true). In the case of the UN-DPI/Watchtower association, the collaboration was only by disseminate positive information about UN, in this new case, it is not only word but acts, a clear participation at one of UN programs concerning development.
3/In the UN-DPI/Watchtower association, even if the Watchtower has lied concerning the access of the library (it was possible to have access to the library in a different manner without sustaining UN), it is difficult to see the benefit of the association with the DPI. The only possible benefit that Watchtower had, was a kind of respectability when they talked to government or in the OSCE conference (Hey, we are an NGO associated with the UN/DPI, look how respectable we are !). Here, the benefits are evident, the customers of IAPSO, in this case the Watchtower as an NGO, has perhaps buyed some procurement at a limited cost.(Vehicules, computers ?)
4/ If they have used the IAPSO facilities to buy some procurements. They have presented a clear project of development to the IAPSO to be validate as a IAPSO customer, even more they have perhaps accept to be an actor of one of a development program of UNDP. What kind of development project the Watchtower has in third world nation ?

I have write to the IAPSO to know what project the Watchtower has in collaboration with UNDP few weeks ago. I have no answer. If some of you have the time and the abilities in english to write to them, perhaps the IAPSO team will consider the matter ?

I have tried this e-mail, which is in the frontpage of their website: Susan.Struck@undp.org, perhaps it is not here to make inquiries.

Please help !!!!

Thanks Lo-Ru-Hamah !!

Well Hawkaw are you here ? I think you (and evidently others) have all the abilities to clarify the issue.

Or here: http://www.iapso.org/about/

IAPSO, we have a vision - ‘Buying for a Better World’.


With over twenty years of experience in supporting the aid and development community globally, we understand how access to world-class procurement services can dramatically increase efficiency, quality and transparency whilst reducing costs and delivery times.

Serving the Development Community
We understand the specific needs of the development community. Whether our customers are UN Agencies, International Finance Institution borrowers, NGOs or governments, they benefit not only from our experience but also from our principles of transparency and accountability as defined by the United Nations Development Programme.

Increased Range of Services
Our range of procurement services continues to grow. We have always been known for negotiating long-term agreements on behalf of the UN System and its partners in development. However, we have also become increasingly active in the role of procurement agent for large-scale, complex projects.

Building Capacity
We are committed to building capacity at field level and our ever-increasing range of training and consultancy services is aimed at increasing professionalism in all aspects of local and international procurement.

btt

It could be possible that the Watchtower has only used the training courses of IAPSO concerning procurement, if it is the case, why they have not use other organisation who could provide this kind of courses ?

By the "guest" entrance...