Yes, I have seen it b/4.  I find it interesting that there is no where to comment or get in contact w/ the author.  So it seems like a one-side convo. 

Anyways, isn't the whole JW motto, no party of the world regardless of how small it might be.  That being the case, if yet one mere person were stumbled by the WTBTS appearance of being associated w/ the evil UN, why wouldn't they totally avoid it like they expect every other robot of a JW to do!  Personally, I don't care why they were associated w/ UN, just the fact that they kept it a uber secret is what I find annoying.  They make all the rest of the "flock" tell their bad deeds (even private things b/w husbands and wives), but they are not held to the same standards.

I've read a good part of the site, one of the most amusing to me is his weak and feeble attempt to make it sound like whoever in Brooklyn

registered with the UN as an NGO to gain access to their library, was as innocent as apple pie.. It's quite apparent and obvious, particularly to long time JWS that whoever did register went

directly against the rules of not getting involved with worldly government affairs and the action did indeed go against that set doctrine.

It seems that who ever did the deed knew it was against their own set of principles but did it anyways to get an open access to the library.

And probably thought no one would take notice, devious but practical. Unfortunately they got caught it came out in the open and they had to start damage control.

The entire web-site is all wrought with bias for the WTS. and there is no way to make a rebuttal of any kind to his statements, which shows his

intensional loyalty to the JWS but at the same time shows where his personal integrity is at also.

In all practicality even if a simple elder was to do such a thing and it was found out by his own associated elders that elder would have probably been up in front of a

JC committee without question.

It would be easy to assume that the individual or individuals who did the registering was probably a GB member or someone at the top level of the organization, but no mentioning

of any hand slapping, rather a blatant back peddling and a whole bunch of weak excuses, I guess like in any other organization power has its privileges

Funny- I was getting ready to post a topic about this particular website earlier this week, but I didn't have time.

Whenever I first encountered anything "apostate" on the internet, I encountered this website and the one run by "e-watchman" or whatever. I was pretty shocked at first, but then the more I read about it, the more I saw that most of those members support the idea that the Watchtower is fulfilling so many prophecies, and that they are the modern-day Jerusalem (or some crap like that).

Anyways, I saw through the crap months later and found other websites that simply pointed out quotes from the decades of Watchtowers/Awakes and saw that the WTBTS is nothing more than a huge publishing company, operating without any kind of Godly direction.

In 1966 I went to prison to uphold the WT view of Neutrality, which meant back then, a non-involvement in the political affairs of this world.

They broke their neutrality.  They also got deeply involved in "interfaith" at the UN meetings they shared in.

Both are disfellowshipping offenses, which I did.  After I disfellowshipped them, they had the audacity to disfellowship me.

If it is "no big deal" and not wrong for them to have become associate "NGO's" of the UN,------------then why in the HELL did they get out within three days of getting caught?

The guy who does the site that is referenced here is nothing but a lying son of a bitch, bastard, evil WT worshiper.

If you want to know how I really feel----

Brant

Here's another enlightening link:

http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/11/156075/1.ashx

I only have one short question.

Was the Watchtower associated with the UN?  Yes or No?

Yes.

They slept with the Wild Beast.

This makes the WT a whore.

Plain and simple. Not all the words of all the apologists in the world will change that.

Andy