"3.) the family/guardian has every right to go to authorities with no repurcussion."
***** I have read many accounts where the accuser was disciplined by the congregation for "going public" in cases where they did not have a second witness.
Yet rule number three says no repercussions if they went to the "authorities".
Were they disciplined for going public to other "JW's" instead?
***** I have read many accounts where the accuser was disciplined by the congregation for "going public" in cases where they did not have a second witness.
Yet rule number three says no repercussions if they went to the "authorities".
Were they disciplined for going public to other "JW's" instead?