Now we need a lawsuit to test this. Besides the potential for lawsuits related to blood and associated costs, what are the other implications of this? And I wonder in what other areas this could be applied? Additionally, courts are now willing to allow aggrieved citizens to sue their church if it misrepresented a secular fact.[4] For example, one court has held a religious organization liable for misrepresenting its use of donated funds.[5]
| Member | Post |
|---|
| serendipity | Re: Journal of Church and State: WT NO-BLOOD EXPOSE' | |
Now we need a lawsuit to test this. Besides the potential for lawsuits related to blood and associated costs, what are the other implications of this? And I wonder in what other areas this could be applied? Additionally, courts are now willing to allow aggrieved citizens to sue their church if it misrepresented a secular fact.[4] For example, one court has held a religious organization liable for misrepresenting its use of donated funds.[5] | ||
| IP: ErjoJG5QQ+Wf/Tw0 |
by serendipity:
Correct formatting | |
Journal of: WET-XPOSE'
by
magoo
on