inbyathread	Re: Journal of Church and State: WT NO-BLOOD EXPOSE'
	I'm sorry but I really don't know what or how this is going to help.  I must really be dense on this one.  The WT as consistently called new information or changed doctrine by their favorite phrase "new light"  As long as they speak as church doctrine are they not protected by the laws of church and state?  When the Pope speaks "for the Church" he nor the church can be held accountable for anything said.  If the GB wants to state "whatever" even though it is a lie and put it alongside the articles of faith.  Those members of the WT must believe or leave.  The shunning continues as always and the WT stays in power. The WT has all but admitted that any member CAN have a blood transfusion "if they want to"  but they will by doing so show their desire to remove themselves from the membership roles.  And the shunning begins. For those without a degree in jurisprudence - English please.
IP: IylFhPKQORvWwGTq