Carla wrote "The child found his policy of inaction an action in itself."
That is exactly what left political thinking would say - and have said and continue to say - about this, and I am not trying to speak negatively about left political thought here. The reasoning is, that if you have a left, let us call it Socialist, government win an election or come to power, like in Chile some years ago, or Cuba today, then a group not participating in the political life, like the JWs, will in fact work for a turnover back to the capitalist system, they will be anti-government, because Socialism means that the whole people should participate in political action and build a new society. The, on the other hand, in a capitalist society, a group like the JWs, being inactive, will in fact work for a status quo, because the ruling capitalist government is interested in prolonging the system and is not interested in change.
So a JW in a capitalist society is indirectly working for capitalism and he is anti-socialist, which means pro-government. A JW in a socialist society is also indirecly working for capitalism and he is anti-capitalist, which means anti-government. A neutral JW is therefore always anti-left and pro-right.