All right, let me stir the pot a little.

If such child-killing would happen today, imagine the shock, the outcry over it. And most if not all religions would also join in to express outrage.
Is there
ever a justification for killing children? Our society actually believes so, as there have been a staggering number of abortions legally performed on MILLIONS of children since 1972. This is one of those emotional topics, of course, but it surely seems that
when a woman's freedom is on the line, then YES, there IS justification for killing children. (Of course, from the pro-choice position, there is no 'child' involved so to them the question is moot... Yet
that declaration is, to me, another amazing display of the extent of our denial. Certainly denial
is necessary for electing to kill an unborn child.)
(Let me continue on about the dilemmas in abortion a little, then I'll move on.)
I knew a man who hated abortion--yet defended it when women prisoners in Romania, raped by guards, let a fellow prisoner (a doctor) perform abortions on them. The doctor was a Christian. The women were aware that the children would die of starvation, if not killed outright by the guards. Was this kind of abortion merely 'convenience', too, and worthy of moral outrage from pro-lifers of today?... I soften here, thinking.
Or, other situations:
medically necessary abortions. That is, when the mother's life is at stake due to an ectopic pregnancy or other unusual medical condition... Should therapeutic abortions also be outlawed? Is moral rage commanded? ... Or, what about when the child is a product of
rape? Or, what about if the child is aborted at 8 months as opposed to 3 months--or vice versa?
OR, What about pulling a plug on a machine that delivers food or air to a brain dead or comatose child--especially if such an action that would
absolutely result in the child's death?
Or, if we look in history at groups that preferred to kill their own children to spare them rape, torture and slavery (eg, Masada, but there are others), what kind of emotions do we deal with, if we know more details? Are ALL of these types of
deliberate endings "murder", and worthy of outrage? These are all hard questions. They are hard to answer.
Is it always a black and white answer? Or does something else affect the answers?
I realize that I'm
not quite addressing the moral outrage that you are feeling at
God. But I am trying to point out something important that is quite related: it
is possible to imagine a scenario where a child
might be killed and there would be no shock or moral outrage in even this "advanced" society, because we believe there is a valid justification. And if there is such cases among us, then perhaps we could reflect that God also determines when the killing of a child may be a tragedy due to the circumstances, yet
not be 'morally outrageous' on God's part. There is, it seems,
that possibility.
As for
me, I learned long ago that addition as well as the "edition" of details affects my opinon. Surface information rarely gives me enough for a solid opinion on important matters. And digging deeper is a commitment.
bebu
