UnDisfellowshipped, I'm going to try and answer each question one at a time.You said that (Also, probably the most important issue is the fact that starting in the middle 1980's, the Jehovah's Witnesses stopped Baptizing people "in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit", and they started Baptizing people "in the name of the Father, and the name of the Son, and the name of spirit-directed Watchtower Organization".)I can't deny nor confirm that this is being done in the organization. But what they said makes since. They acknowledged the name of God first, this means that they recognize that Jehovah and the Holy spirit are one and the same. They acknowledged the name of the Christ, then they acknowledged the Organization. I don't see where they broke any laws. We all know that God and the Holy spirit are one and the same right! So separating them could cause people to believe that we support the trinitarian belief that God, Son and the Holy spirirt are one and the same.
| Member | Post |
|---|
JW Baptism
by
UnDisfellowshipped
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
Prisca
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
Pistoff
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
Cicatrix
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
KAYTEE
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
heathen
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
onacruse
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
LittleToe
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
unbaptized
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
Robdar
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
Pleasuredome
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
unbaptized
on
| unbaptized | Re: JW Baptism | |
| IP: R5aj3/DnORpFn8La | ||
Re: JW Baptism
by
onacruse
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
unbaptized
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
unbaptized
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
onacruse
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
unbaptized
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
unbaptized
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
larc
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
onacruse
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
unbaptized
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
onacruse
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
unbaptized
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
larc
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
unbaptized
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
larc
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
onacruse
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
found
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
unbaptized
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
onacruse
on
Re: JW Baptism
by
Gizmo
on