Viewed 1646 times
Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
Kristofer
|
Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:05:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
|---|---|
![]() CaliforniaPost 26 of 274 Since 12/24/2005 |
I'm not sure how much of this is old news to y'all but after being handed this literature, I was trying to find evidence on the Ante-Nicene Fathers it quotes in this pamphlet. I figured, if early Christians didn't believe in it, then, to me anyway, the doctrine held some water. I stumbled upon this essay by Eric Francke which is a direct response to the pamphlet and very well written in my opinion. I also found a link to the writings of the early church fathers that you can read for yourself rather than listen to what other people think they said. I was shocked by the academic dihonestly. Happy reading:
http://home.comcast.net/~neirr/believeintrinity.htm http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/ For the early Church Fathers page, if you click on the [V2] You can read the contents. |
Kristofer
|
Re: Should You Believe in the Trinity? - a response
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:05:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 27 of 274 Since 12/24/2005 |
I didn't know how to make my urls into links. Sorry about that
|
MerryMagdalene
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:49:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() IdahoPost 2212 of 2646 Since 8/19/2004 |
Here ya go (I think):http://home.comcast.net/~neirr/believeintrinity.htm http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/ ~Merry |
Hellrider
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:21:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() Post 1172 of 2228 Since 6/26/2005 |
I read thru them now. The dishonesty of the WTS just shocks me even more and more. Someone should write a book called "The art of ripping passages out of context", using WTS-litterature as examples. They truly are the intellectually (although I hate to use that word about them) most dishonest people in the world. I saw an article once before, written by Alan F, in which he showed how they twisted statements from scientists and ripped quotes out of context to make them suit their agenda, and I was shocked. Well, this trinity-brochure is even more shocking, one a person reads the full quotes from the early church fathers, and the context in which is was written. I want to encourage all JWs who are reading this, to check out what the early church fathers waid for themselves, and then examine the JW-trinity-pamphlet again.
|
LittleToe
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:28:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() Scotland, Western Isles (Na H-Eileanan An Lar)Post 13378 of 17187 Since 9/12/2001 |
I'm beyond caring about arguing the Trinity doctrine, but it was the WTS Trinity Borchure that put the last nail in the coffin, for me, regarding and residual belief that they were just misguided.Freeminds has a brochure available that shows the source of all the quotes they use. They are clearly completely dishonest in how they pick and match excerpts. It additionally made me wonder that if their case was so watertight, why resort to those methods? http://www.freeminds.org/sales/books.htm |
|
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:30:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() Post 6247 of 12330 Since 9/1/2002 |
In my case, the broshure was released after I had already researched the writings of the apostolic fathers/apologists, and I was really shocked at the misrepresentation.....this was the proverbial "last straw" for me. When the book study started covering the broshure, I tried to find whatever excuse not to go to meetings because I could not sit there and have to let these misrepresentations pass... |
|
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:36:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
|
Post 404 of 453 Since 12/30/2005 |
well the trinity is a false doctrine any way.jehovah is GOD jesus is his son its simple
![]() |
Kristofer
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:40:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 29 of 274 Since 12/24/2005 |
YOu gotta love the open mind.
|
Lady Lee
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:49:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() OntarioPost 8866 of 13120 Since 6/29/2001 |
PMJ well the trinity is a false doctrine any way.jehovah is GOD jesus is his son its simple The issue here isn't the veracity of the doctrine. The issue here is the misrepresentation by the WTS who for decades have misquoted real researchers and academics and twisted what other people say to suit their own purpose.Please stay on topic |
LittleToe
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:49:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() Scotland, Western Isles (Na H-Eileanan An Lar)Post 13379 of 17187 Since 9/12/2001 |
PMJ: Is it possible for you to miss the point so completely? Regardless of whether they are right or wrong about the doctrine, they're lying to you, man! |
Hellrider
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:50:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() Post 1173 of 2228 Since 6/26/2005 |
well the trinity is a false doctrine any way.jehovah is GOD jesus is his son its simple So PMJ, if it`s really that simple, then why does the WTS mispresent, distort and twist quotes from the early church fathers on the issue? Why couldn`t they just come flat out and say "ok, we read thru the texts of the early church fathers, and realize that they did in fact believe in the Trinity...but they were wrong in doing so"? Why all the lying? |
|
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:51:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
|
Post 405 of 453 Since 12/30/2005 |
you sure have.i love how the bible is so clear on this matter.no were in the bible does it say jehovah jesus and the holy spirt are the same person.only if we twist scriptures may it look like they are.but if we look at what the bible realy says its so simple.jehovah is God jesus is his son.not to hard to understand. why do some people have to make it complicated
|
|
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:56:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
|
Post 406 of 453 Since 12/30/2005 |
well the people you say the wbts have twisted there words may be so.but there only doing it for something no for a fact is true.the people who may of been miss quoted.have miss quoted the bible in the first place
|
|
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:00:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() Post 6248 of 12330 Since 9/1/2002 |
but if we look at what the bible realy says its so simple.jehovah is God jesus is his son.not to hard to understand. why do some people have to make it complicated
Because it is complicated. Why does the NT apply scriptures that refer to "Jehovah" and apply them to Jesus? Just one example: “And it shall come to pass that everyone who calls on the name of Yahweh shall be saved. For in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem there shall be those who escape, as Yahweh has said, and among the survivors shall be those whom Yahweh calls” (Joel 2:32). "If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved. For the Scripture says, ‘Everyone who believes in him will not be put to shame.’ For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; the same Lord is Lord of all, bestowing his riches on all who call on him. For ‘everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved' " (Romans 10:9-13) There are many, many more where that comes from.(Sorry to contribute to the shift in topic, folks, just wanted to get that in) |
Kristofer
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:06:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 30 of 274 Since 12/24/2005 |
Lady Lee, thank you for setting the issue straight.
PMJ - 2 Corinth 3:17 Now Jehovah is the Spirit; and where the spirit of Jehovah is, there is freedom. |
|
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:08:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
|
Post 408 of 453 Since 12/30/2005 |
yes jehovah os lord ans so is jesus.and we have to be thankful to both of them.but this doesnt not mean they are the same person.
|
|
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:08:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() Post 6249 of 12330 Since 9/1/2002 |
well the people you say the wbts have twisted there words may be so.but there only doing it for something no for a fact is true.the people who may of been miss quoted.have miss quoted the bible in the first place
So basically you're saying that it's okay to lie if you're misrepresenting someone who lied first? It's okay for an entity calling itself "God's organization" and "the truth" to lie?Of course, your statement that the apostolic fathers "misquoted" the Bible is based only on your own presuppositions and not on anything they say per se (or have you read them?) |
ballistic
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:09:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() EnglandPost 6714 of 9237 Since 8/7/2001 |
Why does the NT apply scriptures that refer to "Jehovah" and apply them to Jesus?
Although I am agnostic \ evolutionist \ my own personal "istic" thing now, I still can't see the point of a trinity, when the Jehovah of the old testament is so different to the God of the New Testament. Why try to equate the Jesus who promoted Love with the God of war?> just curious. |
Kristofer
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:11:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 32 of 274 Since 12/24/2005 |
PMJ, no one said they are the same person. They are distinct separate persons but they are the same God.
There are also many reasons to believe that it is Jesus who spoke in the OT as well. Every voice heard and image seen was Jesus. According to scripture, no one has seen nor heard the Father at any time. |
Hellrider
|
Re: Trinity pamphlet, - a response & research
posted Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:18:00 GMT
(2/11/2006)
|
![]() Post 1174 of 2228 Since 6/26/2005 |
I still can't see the point of a trinity, when the Jehovah of the old testament is so different to the God of the New Testament. Why try to equate the Jesus who promoted Love with the God of war?> just curious. Well, strictly they are not the same "person", they are "three" of the same essence. And that yhwh is the God of war is ...a matter of opinion. He certainly wasn`t a pacifist-God (ha ha), but to make the claim that yhwh was plain evil, that is something that can be discussed, but not established as a fact (it was part of Gods plan, all those other tribes had to be wiped out to ensure history would take its course, so Jesus could spread the word to all of mankind etc blah blah blah, you know.. )Oh, by the way PMJ: If it`s okay to lie and misrepresent if ones cause is right, does that go for all people who believe their cause is right? Or only for "the truth"?
![]() |



Home

California



Scotland, Western Isles (Na H-Eileanan An Lar)



Ontario
)